YUM…

Can’t we all just get along so that I can hop my American behind on a plane over to Iran to see the Turkey Bird fly one last time? Iran you are sitting on tourism gold with your Tomcats! PLEASE, give the nukes up so that I can get my Grumman fix! It is simply amazing that these incredibly complex antiques are still plowing the skies in decent numbers over there some 30+ years after they, and everything related to them, were embargoed. Daily proof that we should never under estimate Iran’s ingenuity…

iran F-14 Tomcat fighter jet of the Islamic Republic of Iran Air Force (IRIAF) Bushehr province of Iran. usn navy united states2 (2)

37_9001270573_L600

 

 

 

 

 

13876_10151387733233603_1152104854_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

24616_518188444885719_1691545200_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

547693_10151388448008603_23189199_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7vbjwt8m4t6s0cbhzejs

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

541441_10151387732153603_183819543_n

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9luc905ypcrd28vwgsxg

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Persian F14

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46875_10151366434703603_1193996564_n 3583_10151387733878603_1261149878_n

Filed in Photo | 17 Comments

WE PUT A MAN ON THE MOON IN LESS TIME THAN…

…it has taken for the DoD to field a precision light air support aircraft for Afghanistan’s fledgling Air Force! I have been pounding this for years, long before it was “a story.” This is a total disgrace for America and runs totally counter-intuitive to our loudly stated aims of “leaving Afghanistan via making the Afghans handle their own security.” Furthermore, this total near-sighted mess is clear evidence of the cancer that riddles our Department of Defense and the ongoing disconnect between the White House’s soaring policies and the DoD’s realities. Why not give them A-10Cs at this point? Apparently we don’t need them anymore anymore and they are already paid for…

http://defensetech.org/2013/04/23/afghan-air-force-waits-on-light-attack-aircraft/

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2013/04/armed-drones-afghanistan/

More Aviationintel articles on this topic: http://aviationintel.com/category/light-air-support-contract-afghanistan/

PS: No I will not stop harping on this issue. It is a showcase of how our leadership, industry and our defense department are failing America systemically and it needs to be addressed. Nothing gets fixed by sitting quietly and waiting, sad fact of life.

Filed in Light Air Support Contract & Afghanistan, News, Opinon | 2 Comments

TYNDALL RAPTOR’S WILD RIDE!

F-22_4018Check out this incredible plot and track from Flightaware.com that a valued reader sent me! One hell of a journey for this multi-hundred-million-dollar jet! Usually these flights are concealed from the Flightaware database, but sometimes military traffic shows up for one reason or another. Was this Raptor actually descending and ascending at such a rapid rate? Was it testing something? Maybe looking at issues with the aircraft’s environmental system and/or Combat Edge quasi-pressure suit which have been a major issue for program over the last couple of years? Or maybe the strange radar returns and tracks have to do with the different aspects of the aircraft’s stealthy structure and skin in relation to the radar’s antenna at certain directions. For instance, the jet appears very low whenever it points east in the designated area it was maneuvering. Or maybe this was just a training sortie to familiarize pilots with the jet’s handling capabilities and human factors? Who knows, but it is a great find. Love to know your thoughts on it guys…

adadad

 

 

 

 

R1333

 

 

 

 

 

Time     Position     Orientation     Groundspeed     Altitude     Reporting Facility
EDT     Latitude     Longitude     Course     Direction     KTS     MPH     feet     Rate     Location/Type
11:25AM     30.0700     -85.5765     23°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:26AM     30.0700     -85.5765     24°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:27AM     30.0700     -85.5765     22°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:27AM     30.5856     -85.2236     24°     Northeast     476     548     23,000      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:28AM     30.0700     -85.5765     12°     North                  Level     Estimated
11:28AM     30.5717     -85.0664     96°     East     482     555     23,000      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:29AM     30.0700     -85.5765     25°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:29AM     30.5658     -84.9069     92°     East     495     570     23,000      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:30AM     30.0700     -85.5765     23°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:30AM     30.6225     -84.7586     66°     East     480     552     23,100      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:31AM     30.0700     -85.5765     23°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:31AM     30.6789     -84.6050     67°     East     492     566     23,000      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:32AM     30.0700     -85.5765     24°     Northeast                  Level     Estimated
11:32AM     30.7264     -84.4756     67°     East     492     566     23,000      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:33AM     30.7825     -84.3289     66°     East     497     572     23,000     -60 Level     Jacksonville Center
11:34AM     30.8361     -84.1894     66°     East     486     559     22,900     -60 Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:35AM     30.8939     -84.0400     66°     East     488     562     22,900     -600 Level     Jacksonville Center
11:36AM     30.9517     -83.8978     65°     Northeast     498     573     21,700     -2,580 Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:37AM     31.0069     -83.7481     67°     East     470     541     17,700     -3,720 Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:38AM     31.0536     -83.6250     66°     East     438     504     14,300     -3,420 Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:39AM     31.1003     -83.5039     66°     East     391     450     10,900     4,200 Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:40AM     30.9175     -83.9797     246°     West     492     566     22,900     5,880 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:41AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:42AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:43AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:44AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:45AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:46AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900     -12,660 Level     Jacksonville Center
11:46AM     31.2183     -83.1939     66°     East     287     330     7,100      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:47AM     30.9175     -83.9797     246°     West     492     566     22,900     -2,580 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:47AM     31.1389     -83.1911     72°     East     273     314     4,500      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:48AM     30.9175     -83.9797     252°     West     492     566     22,900     -2,400 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:48AM     31.0681     -83.1908     77°     East     265     305     2,100      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:49AM     30.9175     -83.9797     258°     West     492     566     22,900     -1,140 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:49AM     31.0158     -83.1908     82°     East     174     200     1,000      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:50AM     30.9175     -83.9797     262°     West     492     566     22,900     180 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:50AM     30.9594     -83.1931     86°     East     231     266     1,200      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:51AM     30.9175     -83.9797     267°     West     492     566     22,900     1,560 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:51AM     30.9050     -83.1661     91°     East     254     292     2,800      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:52AM     30.9175     -83.9797     271°     West     492     566     22,900     240 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:52AM     30.9575     -83.1156     87°     East     256     295     3,100      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:53AM     30.9175     -83.9797     267°     West     492     566     22,900     11,760 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:54AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:55AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
11:56AM     30.9175     -83.9797     270°     West     492     566     22,900     -16,080 Level     Jacksonville Center
11:56AM     31.1619     -83.1742     70°     East     269     310     2,800      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:57AM     30.9175     -83.9797     251°     West     492     566     22,900     -900 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:57AM     31.0931     -83.1886     75°     East     241     277     1,900      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:58AM     30.9175     -83.9797     256°     West     492     566     22,900     -420 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:58AM     31.0450     -83.1883     79°     East     177     204     1,500      Descending     Jacksonville Center
11:59AM     30.9175     -83.9797     260°     West     492     566     22,900     -720 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
11:59AM     30.9969     -83.1906     83°     East     163     188     800      Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:00PM     30.9175     -83.9797     264°     West     492     566     22,900     660 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:00PM     30.9342     -83.1928     88°     East     250     288     1,500      Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:01PM     30.9175     -83.9797     269°     West     492     566     22,900     5,100 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:01PM     30.8403     -83.2072     96°     East     367     422     6,700      Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:02PM     30.9175     -83.9797     277°     West     492     566     22,900     7,080 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:02PM     30.7753     -83.3278     104°     East     440     506     13,900     -4,740 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:03PM     30.7519     -83.4075     251°     West     449     517     18,200     6,420 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:03PM     30.7267     -83.4847     249°     West     454     522     21,000     3,660 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:04PM     30.7094     -83.5450     252°     West     480     552     21,900     540 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:05PM     30.6628     -83.6944     250°     West     479     551     21,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
12:06PM     30.6200     -83.8267     249°     West     455     524     21,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
12:07PM     30.5794     -83.9592     250°     West     447     514     21,900      Level     Jacksonville Center
12:08PM     30.5469     -84.0769     252°     West     441     507     22,000      Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:09PM     30.5019     -84.2067     248°     West     441     507     21,900     -900 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:10PM     30.4631     -84.3386     251°     West     441     507     20,300     -4,980 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:11PM     30.4172     -84.4847     250°     West     441     507     12,000     -4,200 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:12PM     30.3781     -84.6167     251°     West     441     507     12,000     300 Level     Jacksonville Center
12:13PM     30.3414     -84.7075     245°     Southwest     431     496     12,700     60 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:14PM     30.3039     -84.8342     251°     West     437     503     12,200     -360 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:15PM     30.2664     -84.9633     251°     West     431     496     12,000     -660 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:16PM     30.2394     -85.0828     255°     West     412     474     10,900      Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:17PM     30.2292     -85.1883     264°     West     352     405     12,000     -3,000 Climbing     Jacksonville Center
12:18PM     30.2231     -85.2964     266°     West     339     390     5,000     -4,380 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:19PM     30.2275     -85.3881     273°     West     311     358     3,300     -960 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:20PM     30.2361     -85.4747     277°     West     290     334     3,100     -540 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:21PM     30.2469     -85.5617     278°     West     279     321     2,300     -660 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:22PM     30.2494     -85.6458     272°     West     274     315     1,800     -300 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:23PM     30.2042     -85.7022     227°     Southwest     232     267     1,700     -120 Descending     Jacksonville Center
12:25PM     30.0771     -85.5769     140°     Southeast                  Level     FlightAware Approximate
12:32PM     30.0667     -85.5667     161°     South                  Level     FlightAware Approximate
12:33PM     30.0700     -85.5765     161°     South                  Level     Estimated
12:34PM     30.0700     -85.5765     161°     South                  Level     Estimated
12:35PM     30.0700     -85.5765     161°     South                  Level     Estimated
12:36PM     30.0700     -85.5765     161°     South                  Level     Estimated
12:37PM     30.0700     -85.5765     161°     South                  Level     Estimated

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/HORNT01/history/20130417/1530Z/KPAM/KPAM

Filed in News | 4 Comments

VIDEO UPDATE FROM A POPULAR PAST ARTICLE: THE DC-X “DELTA CLIPPER” LIVES ON WITH SPACEX’s GRASSHOPPER

ORIGINAL PIECE: http://aviationintel.com/2012/05/07/blast-from-the-past-blue-origins-vtol-rocket-a-cousin-of-the-mcdonald-douglas-dc-x-delta-clipper/

“NASA Inc.” is doing what NASA abandoned years ago. Why? Because it makes dollars and sense…

Filed in News, video | Comment Now

HMX-1′S MV-22S TURN “MONEY” GREEN

398946_10200881244941221_662763294_n 905491_562275977136667_56768978_o 904594_562275750470023_1387314901_o 892053_562275457136719_350152017_o

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

You tell me how this makes sense? I realize the CH-53s were needed elsewhere for a period of time and the Phrogs are being phased out, but using an MV-22 to ferry around the White House Press Corps and the President’s team makes zero sense. Now if the whole HMX-1 force were MV-22s that would be a wild luxury but the benefits would be potentially relevant… Keep in mind these things run about $70M per copy and are not the most reliable or low-cost machine available (don’t even start with me on the USMC’s slanted mission capable rate figures). Why not just grab some slick Blackhawks and convert them for the role? The whole USMC obsession with silver bullets or bust, after decades of “getting by,” irks me. In reality Osprey production should have ended this year for the Marines and the S-92 Superhawk should be painted green in this picture, and low-viz gray on ramps, FOBs, and Helicopter Landing Docks around the globe…

Don’t expect to see a Presidential “White Top” MV-22 (would it be a VV-22?) either. I have it first hand that this was not even brought up. Odd huh? A  machine that is super capable of vastly improving the VH-3D’s mission, on paper, yet there is no interest in doing so. Considering that the Osprey flies higher and much faster than the alternatives, and it already has an integrated countermeasure suite including top of the line DIRCM gear (CV-22 did all that dev work) why isn’t the President going to be flying on these? Hell, HMX-1 is getting 12 of them for goodness sake! The answer probably is safety and stigma. Yeah I know it’s technically the safest helicopter in the inventory right now but it’s not that simple and you know it. The only reason these things should be painted green is if the DoD and POTUS can prove they are more cost-effective than conventional helicopters, in that they will use them to fly from DC to NYC and other sub-400 mile trips in the vicinity instead of firing up Air Force One. Then they could potentially pay for themselves if White Tops were included in the fleet.

Sad… Its not such a bad idea, but it will never happen because we have an administration like, others before it, where everyone else has to get creative about doing more with less, but them.  As I stated earlier, there appears to be no sequestration for the Presidential Airlift office and their supporting military components.

Ground 17 USAF combat squadrons but let’s make sure these $70M VIP Opsreys shine, a role that should be accomplished by a machine a third of the cost and reduced in flight hours at that. Again, DoD procurement is a broken and ironic institution, and I don’t see Sec Def Hagel capable of doing anything about it. It is all ridiculous and insulting.

Nothing, and I mean nothing, makes sense anymore…

Filed in News, Opinon | 7 Comments

LOCKHEED UNVEILS THEIR UNCLASS CONCEPT: “SENTINEL PRIME?”

http://www.lockheedmartin.com/us/products/uclass.html

Such a poor time to introduce expensive and cutting edge new potential weapons systems, but none-the-less Lockheed’s “Sea Ghost” design that will compete with the likes of Northrop Grumman’s X-47 based design, Boeing’s Phantom Ray and General Atomic’s Sea Avenger for the Navy’s first operational UCAV has a serious pedigree and will be one hell of a competitor for this crucial tender. Clearly, Lockheed has taken major design cues from its now famous RQ-170 Sentinel as a proven configuration to build off of, really the only known semi-autonomous stealthy unmanned system operational around the world today. This video is so interesting because it lightly mentions some of the true advantages that these machines will feature such as autonomy and multi-platform “fused” operations with minimal human intervention or guidance. All things I have discussed here for years and in great detail.

If you have not already make sure to read my widely distributed piece “Tyler’s 10 Thoughts On The Future Of Drone Warfare” for more big picture discussion on what lies ahead in the very much unmanned future of combat aviation please have a read.

UCLASS and UCAV’s in general are where the future truly lies for first days of war anti-access bashing and surveillance weapons platforms. Those who say a human needs to remain in the cockpit for these missions are frankly fools or they are speaking from their pocket book and not their conscious. In UCAVs, America has the chance to leap far ahead of the world in terms of air combat capability by redefining what air combat means at its very core and by literally re-writing the book on what cutting edge capabilities are considered, well, cutting edge. I am talking quantum leap here guys. The timing has never been better to fully embrace our unmanned future, it makes DOLLARS and SENSE.

I feel absolutely terrible that I have not finished my piece requested by the Aviationintel readership about the “realities” of UCAV development and maturity at this time. In fact I have about 5 pieces that are almost done but for whatever reason I have left and not finished as life got in the way- Future of Red Flag, the damn Zero Dark Thirty review, a huge fragmented piece on North Korea I HAVE to get up as its predictions are coming true as I write this, and a couple others including a half written piece on net centric warfare. As far as the UCAV piece, I think I am going to condense what I have this weekend and get my thoughts out to advance the discussion here on the site and beyond. Nobody is telling a very shadowy side of the unmanned story, one where facts are vaporous but trends and logic are quite tangible. I simply have to finish this thing up. It is like my mind is having a separate discussion than what my readers understand currently via my body of work. I want to at least give some reasons why I feel so strongly about moving forward with advanced unmanned air combat and accelerating the race to unleash its true potential, although I actually believe that race has already been ran, we just have not been allowed to know the outcome…

Stay tuned guys… If I could I would just write away on this site all day, so pickup the phone Aviation Week or flightglobal.com or wherever and tell them to hire me ASAP haha!

Cheers guys and have a great Friday full shadowy stealth drones zipping around in your head!

Ty

 

Filed in News, Opinon, The F-35 Saga | 4 Comments

UPDATE!: BELL INTRODUCES THE V-280 VALOR

Please refer to this recent piece about Bell’s intentions before continuing: http://aviationintel.com/2013/03/07/blind-faith-or-business-suicide-bell-doubles-down-on-titlt-rotor-technology/

I GIVE THIS THING A 1 IN 10 CHANCE OF SEEING WIDESPREAD US ARMY, NAVY, MARINE OR USAF SERVICE. Although, if they had the bucks, the USCG could really use this type, and even AFSOC to a certain extent, but in limited numbers.

This video is kinda embarrassing. Come on Bell Marketing, the Government is your customer not 8 year old boys. This video delivers little hard info about your product and is cheesy and stupid. Sorry for being so critical, but man I am in the wrong business if crap like this gets green lighted by a major defense player like Bell-Textron.

Here is the website on this thing-

http://bellv280.com/

The future will lie in Boeing (who abandoned the tilt-rotor dream after peddling it for decades with Bell, not a good sign) and Sikorsky’s X-2 pusher type technology. It is simpler, has a smaller footprint and cheaper than the complex tilt rotor concept. Still, even that is a long shot at this point considering the current circumstances.

Filed in News, Opinon | 2 Comments

PIGS FLY? Nah Even More Improbable- Ex-Kiwi A-4K Skyhawks Return To The Sky Once Again!

Screen Shot 2013-04-05 at 7.38.53 PM

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Draken International has done it, the first of the APG-66 radar equipped ex-New Zealand Air Force A-4k Skyhawks, some of the most advanced ever built, and a gaggle of MB-339 trainers have taken flight. A huge congrats to the folks at Draken, many said the New Zealand A-4K deal was a cursed pipe-dream that nobody could make a reality. It is always great to see someone prove the naysayers wrong. This also marks the first time in known history that a private adversary support aircraft is capable of providing a modern and dynamic air to air (and air to ground/surface for that matter) radar threat profile, which could potentially be an industry game changer. Please take a look at my past piece on Draken International for a background on this intriguing new contender in the increasingly competitive contractor adversary support service provider marketplace:

 http://aviationintel.com/2012/08/07/new-aggressor-in-the-commercial-adversary-support-game-draken-international-bets-big-on-red-air/

*Picture courtesy of Draken International

Filed in History | 1 Comment

HOW TO DOWN THE MOST ADVANCED AIR FORCE IN THE WORLD WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT…

…by literally turning the budget that makes that air force fly into a smoking hole in the ground.

ABSOLUTELY READ THIS HISTORIC ANNOUNCEMENT: http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20130408/NEWS/304080035/Reduced-flying-hours-forces-grounding-17-USAF-combat-air-squadrons

249226_10150721843045004_1745586_nWe are our own worst enemy. Our fiscal policy will get us long before the big bad Russian Bear, the Chinese Dragon or some AK-47 packing boogeyman living in a mud hut in the middle of nowhere. Literally, sequester will take about 40% of the USAF’s combat punch off operational status and will gut complex training. Our leadership, in Congress, in the White House, and in the Pentagon, is a joke. This is not about partisan politics (Bush got this insanity rolling, I count him as one of the worst executives of all time, so don’t troll this into a R v D sideshow, get over your harmful “sports team” myopic political views they are divisive and not helpful), this is about a very clear reality that those in power only like to make decisions when they are easy and beneficial, when the ones that really matter come to pass they punt and could really care less where the ball lands. Since we PAY these “leaders” to make not just easy decisions but the tough ones, they are total failures in their profession.

Congress hides in plain site as a shrugging collective herd, safety in numbers you know. The DoD acts like they are victims of circumstance, and the President, well this sure is not his priority right now is it? What happened to his ice cold promise that he would not allow sequestration to come to pass? Such tough words, such steely resolve, yet totally empty in execution. Just more political theater needed to be performed with Oscar winning acuity in order to get a second term of business as usual. Reality- there really was not even a damn fight over sequester. When nobody is to blame (oh the great “who came up with this BS sequester idea in the first place” debate) nobody in Washington even cares. Your Government has checked the hell out and as a consequence we are throwing out prized military capabilities that took decades of momentum, billions in treasure and even brave lives to realize. Why? Because nobody, or at least very few in power, are willing to make the hard decisions or come up with actual solutions to very real problems. Maddening. And for those of you who want to comment “get over it man, this is Washington DC, it will never change” I say you are a part of the problem not the solution. We would still be living in caves if everyone had your lax and empty fortitude and total lack of creative vision. In fact your very freedom to be an apathetic and lazy pawn was won by people who did not share such a flaccid outlook on an individual’s ability to make a difference. In more clear terms, I am sick of that cop-out and I don’t want to hear it anymore.

420369_10152588220910004_1281050072_nI find it very strange that 17 USAF squadrons are being GROUNDED, including the USAF Thunderbirds Jet Demonstration Team, yet Air Force One showed up at SFO last week, along with a pair of Marine One helicopters, a squadron of Marine force protection and staff transport helicopters, the Presidential Motorcade, assorted heavy transports and hundreds of Secret Service so that President Obama could raise $3.2 million for Nancy Pelosi’s reelection. Air Force One is all about “The One” apparently, the rest of us won’t get to see or interact with the military we pay for this year. Think of it as ending White House Public tours but at 600kts and 7.5Gs… Nice.

With this in mind I ask where is sequester for the Presidential Airlift fleet? So 17 USAF combat squadrons can’t fly, the Thunderbirds have their wings clipped so no public USAF presence and the front line guys that still remain flying get their precious complex training hours slashed, but the money burning tub known as Air Force One gets to cruise around with unlimited mileage? How is a Nancy Pelosi’s fundraiser “essential operations?” It is good to be king I guess, that way none of the rules or “tough decisions” ever apply to you.

I challenge the White House to significantly curtail non-essential VC-25 operations and related executive travel just like the rest of the USAF. Are endless vacations, constant trips to Hollywood and political fund raisers seriously justified expenses right now? Considering the readiness of our prized USAF will be degraded to a degree never imagined before I really doubt that such luxuries are necessary. I mean I would venture to guess that the President’s trip to San Francisco cost more than the money raised at the political fund raiser. One has to ask themselves, why not just have the Government write Pelosi a check instead? I bet it would have been cheaper for the tax payer!

559300_10151892574855004_1623746163_nMaybe this news will finally reveal the myth that is the Joint Strike Fighter “program.” That myth being that we can’t afford such a concept in relevant numbers, yet alone that we don’t even need it. Think about, if even with this relatively small cut of sequester our Air Force gets put out to pasture than how on earth do the geniuses at the DoD expect to procure, operate and support 2500+ F-35s which cost between twice and four times that of the aircraft they intend to replace and at least twice as much to sustain and operate? What cancer is living in the halls of our military’s command and Congress that would continue to usher us down this clear path of strategic un-sustainability? How can they even explain such clearly insolvent plans? I mean I see posts about the Super Hornet’s replacement, the F/A-XX, really what the F-35 should have been, and I just laugh sadly. What planet are these guys even living on? We cannot afford the decades old hodgepodge of aircraft we have now yet alone a sea of F-35s, yet alone a sixth generation super-duper fighter! Am I missing something here?

We desperately need a real fighting man or woman with stars on their collar to come out and tell Congress and the nation that the enemy is us, and that things like the LCS, F-35 and so on are a liability militarily at this point. It is so damn clear that we need to procure a diverse set of capabilities that are flexible and will allow commanders to mix and match their individual attributes and weigh their “cost benefit” comparative capabilities to the urgency and needs of the mission at hand. Skip a generation in aircraft design, make the best of what we already have and look toward the next “big thing” (unmanned and/or expendable!) for your ultra-high end first day of war capabilities.

74602_10150357072670004_3553135_nThe Air Force could sit down and solve this funding issue themselves right now by doing the unthinkable, and what Congress is unwilling to do, and come up with a rationalized and sustainable force structure and long term budget for the future, featuring a flexible and affordable high-end, low-end capability mix. Cutting readiness and training should be absolutely the last, not first, avenue of action under such circumstances as we all know real the money is saved in procurement. You can have the best gear in the world but if you cannot fight with it proficiently at almost any given time than what the hell is it worth? In other words, buying and sustaining gobs of grossly expensive military hardware that you cannot even afford to use begs the simple question: What the hell is the point in buying it in the first place? 

Spinning squadrons up and down as this plan highlights will only cost us more in the long run to reattain the quality of capability we have enjoyed previously and for which our battle tactics are currently reliant upon. Plus, what will this do to our aircrew corps? In fact this whole thing sounds downright dangerous not just strategically, but also physically for those who are assigned to operate these complex weapon systems. In fact that quality and proficiency, built up over so many years, may be impossible to obtain ever again in mass with such a sad and gutted readiness and training plan.

5808_256620220003_889400_nI sit here and think of America’s spastic military procurement habits over the last couple of decades and reflect on the force we have to today. Seriously, could a child have done better considering where we stand presently? A 35 year old ATF program that gave us 184 F-22 Raptors. A tanker that still has not even taken to the skies even though it was needed a at least a decade and a half ago. Hell, we cannot even buy a couple dozen turboprop attack aircraft for another country without years of mismanagement and damaging industry intervention. The whole DoD procurement joke seems more like a jobs program than an actual defense doctrine to me. Lots of folks lining their pockets or gaining politically capital and a customer (us) with pitifully little to show for it. And now we are about to mortgage the readiness and long-term durability of even this increasingly antiquated military force simply because nobody in power can agree to a sensible, even handed restructuring of government spending. Apparently the business of big party politics is more important than our nation’s ability to defend our interests at home and abroad. In the end it is just another ominous sign of a dimming empire, and the fiddles are playing in mass and at full tempo in Washington’s firey halls of power.

Demand change, at the rate things are going our very security may depend on it…

Filed in News, Opinon, The F-35 Saga | 21 Comments

LAS Boondoggle Never Ends

First read this for an idea on where I stand on this issue:

http://aviationintel.com/2012/10/08/karzai-begging-for-indigenous-aviation-assets-will-go-to-russia-china-and-india-if-us-does-not-act/

http://aviationintel.com/2012/12/21/your-broken-pentagon-usaf-will-re-solicit-proposals-for-the-las-contract/

http://aviationintel.com/2012/04/04/usaf-to-continue-las-bid-with-modificatins/

http://aviationintel.com/2012/10/12/iraq-to-buy-24-aero-vodochody-l-159s-usa-should-immedietly-purchase-the-rest-for-afghanistan/

at-6aerialThe piece below says deliveries of the Light Air Support aircraft for the Afghans will be at best 14 months late since Beechcraft challenged the DoD on selecting Embraer’s product last year. In reality this concept is at least eight years too late. Now we are in crisis mode. It’s bad enough the brain-trust at the Pentagon blew our treasure and threw away valuable fast jet hours by using fighter aircraft to prosecute our wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. These aircraft were incredibly expensive to operate and ill-suited weapons to fight men with AK-47s living in caves and mud huts, now we cannot even get a couple dozen of these relevant turboprops to the Afghans so we can at least begin to actually leave that mess of a land. Couldn’t a child have figured this out as an essential priority as we entered this conflict over a decade ago? It all makes you wonder if those at the top are actually interested in a sustainable force or is it more important to give everyone some green ink, a piece of the “I went to war pie,” even if by doing so you are mortgaging your force’s ability to fight wars in the future and burning through cash and air-frame life at jet turbine speed that will never be equally replaced.

The Pentagon has almost always made itself a weak partner in big defense procurement programs instead of a customer so that they could have more “control” over their pet projects (see constantly change the initial requirements, irrationally accessorizing like a 12 year old girl). In the end this has proven to be a reliable recipe for disaster. Tell the manufacturer what mission you need to cover, let them come up with the damn solution if they are willing to risk their funds to compete in doing so. If nobody wants to compete than the idea is probably not a worthwhile one anyway or it is so big that it is a strategic liability to begin with. Once the DoD is involved as majority risk taking partner the politics start pouring on at a rapid rate as does the cost and developmental timelline and you end up with flying, driving, or floating pork that goes boom.

I don’t know, I have trouble even reading about these programs anymore. Without a White House that actually understands the military I doubt change will ever come. If we allow this never ending bureaucratic garbage to go on without a major change of direction, in the end we will get the military we deserve, which is one that is inflexible, unsustainable and unprepared for battle. Oh wait, that package has already arrived, it took years of wrong turns and uphill dead-ends to finally show up at our door and it was driven here by a guy named Mr. Sequester who said he took it the last few blocks as the original driver, a military leadership man, retired early and went to work at a major defense firm who offered him a massive salary and golden parachute for his “unique knowledge and connections.” Strangely enough, that same firm actually supplied the tires for the delivery van that delivered our “modern military force,” they cost twice that of the commercial alternative’s price per set and they only go flat three times as often, but the rubber is touched by Congressional Representatives from all lower 48 states before it is shipped to China and made into its final form and shipped back for installation. The driver, Mr. Sequester, also said that similar broken militaries are being made in a common, mass produced but budget breaking form now, principally in Texas in a massive building that sits next to an airport. He also said that they too are one day going to be shipped around the world for delivery to their weary customers. Although like our package, the ETA and true cost is really anyone’s guess…

http://www.aviationweek.com/Article.aspx?id=/article-xml/asd_03_29_2013_p01-02-564152.xml

Filed in Light Air Support Contract & Afghanistan, The F-35 Saga | 5 Comments

MESSAGE TO OBAMA ADMIN & THE DOD ON NORTH KOREA: STOP THIS RIDICULOUS ESCALATION, IT IS RECKLESS AND STUPID

29korea-articleLarge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

B-2′s flying highly publicized global strike training missions over South Korea during an incredibly volatile and uncertain time in that region? Ridiculous photos like this coming out of such a mission? It was B-52s last week and a massive training exercise, then this. Do you really think such swagger will help our cause over there? Do you really think that the North Koreans do not know B-2s are based in the area periodically (Guam) and that they can fly strike missions from CONUS with relative impunity? Do we really need to remind them that we have stealth bombers? Why not just send them a pamphlet on the Ohio Class SSBN, their Trident ICBM and its MIRV nuclear warheads instead?

potd-stealth_2521797bIf you were the North Koreans wouldn’t this crap just further cement the rationalization for obtaining a capable nuclear deterrent? It all seems so damn ridiculous and downright childish. Why not STEP BACK from the brink, say that the training exercises have been cancelled due to the alert status of forces and just tell the North that if they cross the line that Pyongyang will be vaporized? Why even lower ourselves to this sort of worthless bravado and saber rattling? The whole thing is alarming, seemingly idiotic for the US to be a part of and, quite honestly, embarrassing. It looks like we are fishing for another war, the “optics” are so bad.

Then again why is the US still in a now very wealthy South Korea, especially to the extent that we are, some 60 years after the war that never ended, ended? There will be a very powerful piece about my views on the US military’s global footprint coming down the line. Some will hate it, others will applaud it, one will stand behind it 100%, and that is me. In the end, if you really don’t at least ask yourself how much of this type of trouble do we actually make ourselves than you are a fool blinded by patriotism of the wrong kind. Our goal should be to prevent war not to play party to, or god forbid even instigate one! In the last decade I have seen so many signs (not just Iraq ok) that seem totally counter intuitive to that mindset. Do you really think ringing our sworn enemies borders with wildly overwhelming conventional military power would somehow make them less interested in arming themselves to the teeth with nuclear weapons? Laughable.

Please, take a step back, cool the engines, and let things simmer down before they boil over out of idiotic strategic direction or out of a simple accident or misunderstanding. Millions of lives and the fragile world economy is on the line. The actions you are taking are doing nothing but making the problem much worse. This kid, Kim Jong Un, is standing on incredibly volatile ground within his own power circle, who knows what hand he is being made to play or what circumstances his vulnerable “throneship” in currently under. Just stop stirring the pot and pushing him to escalate in a responsive fashion in order to show the old guard that he is strong.

On this stupid picture of the B-2 and F-16s- If this was taken near the DMZ, I am especially sickened by it, I really hope and think this would have happened some distance from this area. The B-2′s and F-16′s gear is down to presumably mask the B-2′s true radar signature and to let the North know that it is there, and those Vipers are probably F-16CJs armed with HARMs and AMRAAMs to show (train with as well) that they can defeat the North’s enemy air defense network, and possibly to actively respond to a possible play on that B-2.

I ask a simple question: at what point is a show of force actually bating? A normal dense response from Washington to that question would be “we exercise the right to train with our allies in friendly air space at the time and place of our choosing ” Does that really need to be said? But it is clear that those in power CHOSE THIS TIME AND PLACE to do so and I think that is pretty damn dumb.

Seriously I hated writing this today but the last thing this country or this world needs is ANOTHER war, especially this particular war. This is not an air show, this is not the invasion of a  country we have militarily softened for a decade. The B-2, with all its coolness and capability will not save massive amounts of people from losing their lives in short order if a conflict erupted. This could be loss of life on an unimaginable scale. Just the North’s artillery alone could wipe out Seoul in a few barrages. Very nasty and incredibly scary. So much unknown here and one misstep could change so many lives. Even seeing defense related sites act like this sort of thing is some sort of “badass” waving of the American flag is so low-end and dim that I just had to respond.

Have a good Friday.

Ty

Filed in News, Opinon, Photo | 24 Comments

JUST A REALLY COOL PICTURE: DISCO HAWKEYE!

8526528958_7ebf080023_h

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A buddy of mine, fellow aviation photog, and all around good dude, Dan Kuttel snapped this baby at PDX. Tell me if you have EVER seen a Hawkeye shot like this? Had to post it. More of Dan’s work can be seen here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/dkphotos73/

Programming notes: neck deep trying to finish up some photo work for the USN but I realized I have posts almost totally finished and not posted. Major post first on the big picture of things after my temporary hiatus, then I still have to post the Zero Dark Thirty review (I forgot!) and my piece on Red Flag funding. As always breaking news changes everything…

PS: I know the flickr widget is not working. I hate wordpress with a PASSION, what mess. If I could do it again I would have gone another route. I am not a computer science major so I have to find someone to fix it and my old nerd is MIA. Standby. Some great shots will be posted within a day. My direct Flickr address if you need it: http://www.flickr.com/photos/vector1771/

Filed in Just A Really Cool Picture, Photo | Comment Now

J-20 MISSILE RAIL PHOTO UPDATE

Pictures show a dummy PL-10, or an early derivative of this missile, mounted on the J-20′s unique rail system. The PL-10 is somewhat analogous to the ASRAAM, so we are in the short/intermediate range here (2000ft-20+miles very roughly speaking depending on each unique engagement), which supports my long standing thesis on what this aircraft’s primary mission is, you can read the piece below for a refresher.

p

militairej2035192013032

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

militairej2035182013032

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed in China Rising, News, Opinon, Photo | 1 Comment

CHINESE AIR COMBAT UPDATE: J-20′S WACKY RAILS & TERMINATOR FLANKERS

a7a45bbcgw1e2z5uzszvwg1A couple things here I want to approach. First off, as predicted here months ago (with the help of my readers) the J-20′s is going through weapons bay trials, which will inevitably lead up to some type of test launch. Of particular note is the J-20′s unique short ranged air to air missile deployment device from its side weapons bays. The F-22, a very loose analogue for the J-20 (emphasize very) uses a canted trapeze that pushes the AIM-9′s seeker out into the air-stream for proper establishment of a lock before launch once the bay doors are swung open. Only once the missile has acquired a target and the pilot “receives tone” (the AIM-9 series has an audible growl as hit hunts for a heat source, once it finds one it goes from an intermittent growling sound to a solid tone, cueing the pilot to fire) the missile can be fired and only then do the launch bay doors close up. This method increases the F-22′s stealth signature dramatically while also disturbing the airflow around the jet which makes for lower performance and a rougher ride during close in air combat maneuvering, or dogfighting. missile door 16278845Soon, the F-22 will have the AIM-9X Block II which features lock on after launch data-link capability. In other words, the pilot can “acquire” a target via his or her’s on-board sensors, including the hopefully forthcoming Scorpion helmet mounted sight (this is a great helmet and will allow the pilot to use their high off bore-sight cueing and situational awareness related projections even with night vision goggles, take that JHMCS). Once the target is “virtually locked” within the AIM-9X Block II’s engagement envelope the pilot can quickly fire the Sidewinder, with the doors opening and only closing momentarily, and allow the data-link to transfer the acquiring secondary sensor’s info to the missile after it has left the bay in the form of a vector. 392671799_06b6b950d0_zThe missile will fly in this prescribed direction so that it can acquire the target itself, at which point the AIM-9X Block II to becomes truly “fire and forget.” Once the AIM-9X Block II is integrated into the Raptor, and especially once the helmet mounted display is operational, the F-22′s side bay doors only have to briefly open to let the AIM-9X on its one-way mission. All this begs the question: If China loves copying the US when it comes to weapons systems, why not just build something similar for the J-20 when it comes to deploying its short range air to air missiles?

missile door 16278849The answer is quite simple, lock on after launch capability is not an easy one to achieve. It is technologically complex, requires deep systems integration (software architecture permitting), and robust testing using live missiles, and thus it is expensive. China, being the resourceful and cunning folks that they are, figured out a way to employ any new or relatively archaic high-off-bore-sight short ranged air to air missile while keeping the jet’s aerodynamics relatively intact (doors closed during prolonged maneuvering while the missile hangs out on its rail) while also minimizing the impact a “deployed missile” has the J-20′s low radar cross section. That is right folks, China just said “we don’t want to have to rely on LOAL capability, so why not just temporarily (as in for seconds or minutes) mount a similarly agile, but much less complex and expensive, short ranged air to air missile outside of the bay during times when close range combat is imminent?” This is exactly what they did, and honestly, I think it is genius. Radar signature becomes a small factor when fighting for one’s life at close range, having a reliable missile ready to make U-turn off the rail and subsequently turn your enemy into chaff is so important that is can be seen as a life and death requirement. The alternative, such as the reality the F-22 has faced for the better part of a decade, is that you open the bay up for prolonged periods of time and pay a large penalty in radar cross section and performance. Also by building a relatively simple contraption, kind of similar to one of those bars that goes on your lap on a roller coaster, albeit with a missile attached, Chinese engineers simplified the launch system and also probably made it much lighter than an F-22 type design. Once again, genius.

missile 16278842Another point to be taken from the J-20′s short ranged air to air missile launch mechanism revelations are that designers absolutely thought it was necessary to give this jet high-off-bore-sight close range missile capability from day one, and in a reliable and persistent nature when needed. This could be due to lack of maneuverability and/or because of its mission, which I have said for years is to break through the enemy’s (American, Taiwanese) fighter cover and take out their enablers (see tankers, AEW&C, C2 and connectivity nodes). In such a case, being electronically silent is your best bet at surviving, so using infra-red passively guided missiles, which require no electronic emissions, at medium-close ranges may be your only play, at least for anything that does not put out a continuous or semi-continuous form of radiation (see AWACS or JSTARS) in which case a passively guided anti-radiation missile may be the J-20′s weapon of choice, or a medium-long range AAM that can get within locking distance, featuring active radar or IR/EO for terminal homing, via a traditional data-link feeding the J-20′s targeting picture to it provided by passive sensors (IRST, ESM etc).

missile bay 16278841This is my analysis, I have not had time to look through other people’s opinion on the topic although as always I am damn certain if I am writing it here. Once again, I hope, beg even, that the DoD quits underestimating the Chinese when it comes to their evolving aerospace capabilities and ability to focus their development efforts, and funds, to gaping holes in our order of battle and combat capabilities, all of which that we have acquired by choice and not happenstance.

AIR_Su35b_KnAAPO_Pic_lgIn other news, China got its wish, Russia is selling them the SU-35 Terminator, and with it they will probably get their next generation engine and avionics technology. I could care less what Russia says about protecting theft of their intellectual aerospace property, there are multiple variants of the SU-27 now flying as indigenously developed and unlicensed Chinese weapon systems. Are we really to believe that Russia is just looking past this without compensation to sell a couple dozen fighters? Laughable…

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrapoza/2013/03/25/after-a-decade-long-wait-china-and-russia-ink-super-jet-military-deal/?partner=yahootix

*Thanks to Nico for sending me over some great pics and kicking me in the behind to write about this!

Filed in China Rising, News, Opinon | 6 Comments

EXCLUSIVE: USAF AGGRESSORS FLY WITH IRST POD

DSC_7669_1200w

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It appears that the USAF is getting very serious about the passive detection threat posed by modern infra-red search and track (IRST) systems, most notably against aircraft optimized for minimal radar observability (see F-22,  B-2, F-35, RQ-170 etc). The sensor shown in the photo above, shot during RED FLAG 13-3 that concluded just days ago, is clearly a chin mounted variant of Lockheed Martin’s very capable and ever evolving AN/AAS-42 IRST which originally was fielded on the F-14D and is now an integral part of the latest F-15 Strike Eagle “Tiger Eyes” targeting and navigation sensor suite.

Such a modular system allows an aircraft carrying it to search, track and target an enemy aircraft passively, allowing for almost zero electromagnetic signature if other measures, aside from just turning off the aircraft’s radar, are taken by the operator to shore up the jet’s electronic emissions. With modern data links, especially in receive only mode, that “passive” IRST equipped aggressor could still maintain a synthetic radar “picture” of the battlespace supplied by external sensors. Such tactics can almost totally eliminate the edge provided by advanced electronic service measure systems found of cutting edge fighter aircraft. These systems are essentially incredibly sensitive electronic “listening” and geo-locating systems that use high-speed computer processing and interferometry to detect and locate enemy electronic emissions.

To over-simplify this, if a fighter pilot turns off their radio/EM transmitting systems, radars, radios, jamming systems etc, than you force the other guy (especially advanced fighter aircraft without an IRST, see F-22) to use their radar to detect you (let’s not get into netcentric battlespace and data links here), and that could give away their location. In other words, instead of shining flashlights (scanning with radars) at one another in a dark room you are looking and waiting for the other guy to turn on his flashlight while you remain cloaked in the darkness. Now, an IRST equipped jet would allow you to bypass even a passive electromagnetic detection (waiting for the other guy to turn on his radar) by having the ability to actively scan for an enemy’s precense without emitting any electromagnet energy. In other words, it is like having a pair of night vision goggles on in that dark room. No need to wait for the other guy to turn on his radar while remaining electromagnetically silent, you can detect, track and engage him by detecting his physical infra-red signiture without giving away your precense or location.

Electromagnetic silence, when paired with other coaltion aircraft using disimillar tactics, such as active radar scanning and jammimg, against a more advanced threat can give the less advanced force a fighting chance at having a number of aircraft “break through” the more advanced enemy’s fighter screen. An IRST equipped fighter force can allow that same less advanced force to work more independently with a greater chance of survivability against a non-IRST equipped advanced threat. Now you install an IRST system in a low observable aircraft that is stuffed with sensors and communications gear tailor made to have a low probability of detection and you have a very stealthy and quiet wildcard. The F-35′s DAS system, which has an embedded IRST capability will, when paired with its stealthy design and cutting edge avionics, should be a serious wildcard in the air to air realm. Alternatively, an F-22 with a similar system would be an even more potent killing machine.

What is not clear is exactly how this program was fielded as the F-15C/D fleet had its IRST delayed/cancelled under the Golden Eagle roadmap, instead SNIPER pods were supposed to be deployed as a stopgap measure. I would guess that the sudden deployment of a podded and proven IRST with the 64th AGRS for what was the largest RED FLAG in years was most likely procured and fielded in a modular format with limited aircraft integration along the same lines as systems procured through the USAF’s “Big Safari” rapid testing and fielding unit. Such a deployment could also provide incredibly relevant data and operational experience for the manufacturer, Lockheed Martin. What is not clear is just how deep this program goes, will an IRST become a staple of the USAF’s aggressor fleet or was this a more limited test? Under the current budgetary realities it is possible that this may have been a contractor funded limited endeavour, although I really hope that this is not the case.

Stay tuned as my full “Red Flag’s Future” feature will be posted soon…

*A huge thanks to to fellow aviation photographer and associate editor of Fencecheck.com Mark Munzel for allowing me to share this awesome shot!

Filed in News, Opinon, Photo | 2 Comments