NAVY BEING SEDUCED INTO BUYING V-22 OSPREYS TO REPLACE C-2 GREYHOUNDS

http://defense.aol.com/2012/04/06/marines-push-quietly-but-hard-for-navy-to-replace-c-2s-with-v/

What this poorly researched article does not tell you is that the V-22 is not pressurized and offers a far lower ceiling than that of the C-2. This is important when flying much needed loads to a carrier group surrounded by terrible weather. Further, the the Osprey’s range is a third less than the C-2′s. I have had the pleasure to chat with a ton of C-2 crews over the years, and to put it simply the only replacement for a C-2, some 45 years after it’s birth, is another C-2. Please NAVAIR, just produce or rebuild the C-2 utilizing improvements from the E-2D Hawkeye program and be done with this Osprey nonsense.

 

This entry was posted in News, Opinon and tagged , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to NAVY BEING SEDUCED INTO BUYING V-22 OSPREYS TO REPLACE C-2 GREYHOUNDS

  1. peter says:

    Love to read your articles and opinions. For what its worth, the current Ospreys are not pressurized, but the Block A’s were at one time. The pressurized cockpit/cabin door has since been retrofitted with a lighter one and the exiting pressurized ramp/door is being replaced with a newer lighter version. In Airplane mode, the ceiling is 25,000, while helicopter mode its 10,000. I know the osprey allows 20,000 lbs total internal cargo, do you know what the c2-a’s is? After reading the linked article, what would the Navy change to hub and spoke system to?

  2. aviationintel.com says:

    Peter- thanks so much for commenting. Where did you hear that about the new pressurized components for the V-22? I heard there were other factors beyond doors and ramps which made pressurization a major issue.

    I think they were referring to the Osprey’s unique capability of hauling loads directly to their final destination, sometimes referred to as “the last combat mile.” The C-2 cannot deliver supplies to ships around the battle group etc.

  3. peter says:

    Sorry for the confusion, but I didn’t mean to convey that the original pressurized doors were upgraded for pressurization purposes.
    What I meant to say was, when the pressurization/NBC requirements were dropped, they removed the “Beefed Up” doors with “Normal” doors.
    I’m sure there were other factors. I have heard there were wire harness sealing issues in the cockpit/cabin/wing stow/sponson areas.

  4. aviationintel.com says:

    Ok thanks for clearing that up. I was trying to find out if they were going to retrofit this back in for a next generation proposal but all I kept finding were tidbits of info how the aircraft would be tough to pressurize because of the wing folding mechanisms and other items.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>